Wording of CMS Proposed Rule Causing Undue Angst About Medicare
proposed rule published Jan. 10 by CMS is expected to save the federal government $1.3 billion during a five-year period by curbing fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicare Advantage (Part C) and Medicare Prescription Drug Plan (Part D) programs.
Unfortunately, the wording of the 157-page regulation also created significant angst among some family physicians. Specifically, CMS wrote that it is proposing "to require that physicians or non-physician practitioners who write prescriptions for covered Part D drugs must be enrolled in Medicare for their prescriptions to be covered under Part D."
Some AAFP members who don't participate in Medicare have expressed concern that the proposed rule would affect their ability to prescribe medications for their Medicare patients, but that isn't the case.
"We believe that allowing opt-out physicians and eligible professionals to continue to prescribe covered Part D drugs to a Medicare enrollee would ensure consistency with the Part B program in this regard," the rule says.
In short, the requirement to enroll with Medicare is being confused with a requirement to participate with Medicare. Under this proposed rule, physicians still have the same three options regarding Medicare:
- Physicians may sign a participating agreement and accept Medicare's allowed charge as payment in full for all of their Medicare patients.
- They may elect to be non-participating physicians, which permits them to make assignment decisions on a case-by-case basis and to bill patients for more than the Medicare allowance for unassigned claims.
- They may opt out and become private contracting physicians, agreeing to bill patients directly and forgo any payments from Medicare to their patients or themselves. For example, if you are using the direct pay model of care, you still could do so without changing how you practice or bill. However, you will have to enroll in Medicare for your prescriptions to be covered by these plans.
The rule proposes that physicians and others prescribing drugs for Medicare patients be required to enroll so that CMS can "ensure that Part D drugs are only prescribed by qualified individuals." CMS implemented similar policy regarding durable medical equipment this month. The enrollment requirement actually will have no effect on most AAFP members because both participating and non-participating physicians are already required to enroll to bill for any Part B services that they provide. And, as stated above, CMS plans to continue to allow an option for physicians who opt out.
It is important to remember that this is a proposed rule, and it will not affect family physicians this year. The AAFP has not finalized our response to this proposed rule. Now is the time for you as members to provide the Academy with your thoughts and concerns to help us clarify our response during the comment period. You can do this in the comments area below.
In addition to the enrollment requirement, there are other provisions of this proposed rule the Academy will address. For example, the proposed rule requires formulary inclusion of all drugs within the antineoplastic, anticonvulsant and antiretroviral drug classes, but it no longer requires all drugs from the antidepressant and immunosuppressant drug classes to be included in Part D formularies.
The Academy is in the process of reviewing the proposed rule and will provide comments to CMS before the March 7 deadline. What are your thoughts?
Reid Blackwelder, M.D., is President of the AAFP.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
Search This Blog
Subscribe to receive e-mail notifications when the blog is updated.
- The Center for the History of Family Medicine: At First, I Didn't Care Either. But Now I…
- Primary Care: Defending What it Means and What It's Worth
- Exposing Students to Rural Health Key to Producing Rural Docs
- So You've Achieved PCMH Recognition. Now What?
- California AFP's Success Shows What Chapters, FPs Can Accomplish at State Level